PP Smit Attorneys

Navigating recent legislative changes.

When couples divorce, the division of assets can become a complex matter, particularly where retirement savings are involved. For financial advisors, understanding how marital property regimes and legislation intersect is critical to supporting clients.

Recent legal updates, effective from 1 September 2024, have aligned the definition of ‘pension interest’ across fund types – but getting the wording of divorce orders right remains just as important. The details can make or break the enforceability of an order and ultimately determine whether clients experience a smooth or frustrating outcome.

The impact of marital regimes on pension interest

South Africa recognises three matrimonial property regimes, each with implications for the division of pension interest on divorce.

  • In community of property: All assets (including pension interest) are jointly owned, and therefore divisible.
  • Out of community with accrual: Spouses maintain separate estates but share in the growth of those estates during the marriage. Pension interest forms part of the accrual calculation.
  • Out of community without accrual: Known as ‘cold exclusion’, there is no sharing of assets during or after the marriage. Pension interest cannot be claimed under this regime.

Unless a couple signs an antenuptial or post-nuptial agreement, the default regime is in community of property. This legal backdrop determines whether a claim to pension interest is even possible.

Defining pension interest

Pension interest was previously defined by fund type, but from 1 September 2024 a new definition in the Pension Funds Act has brought uniformity.

It is now calculated as the member’s benefit in the fund, determined by the fund’s rules, on the date of the divorce order. This new definition applies to all retirement funds, including retirement annuity funds.

Although the older definition in the Divorce Act technically remains in place (see below), the Pension Funds Act now overrides it for any divorce orders granted from 1 September 2024 onwards.

Why divorce order wording matters

While the way pension interest is defined has changed, the legal requirements for a valid divorce order remain the same. The following conditions must be met for a retirement fund to act on the order:

  • The fund must be identified or identifiable. Ideally, the fund name and policy number should be included. If a member has more than one policy and no policy number is given, the pension interest will be split across all relevant policies in the fund.  If the member belongs to more than one fund but only one fund is identified, the order is not binding on the other funds.
  • Pension interest must be explicitly awarded. The order must refer specifically to “pension interest”. References to “fund value” or “benefits” are insufficient.  The order must also state either a percentage or a rand amount of pension interest.
  • The fund must be instructed to pay. The order must direct the fund to make the payment, not the member spouse. Simply endorsing the fund’s records is not enough.

It is strongly recommended that parties submit a draft order to the fund for review before finalising it in court.  If an order is found to be non-binding, it must be amended. However, the pension interest will still be calculated using the original divorce date, not the date of the amendment.

Payment options for non-member spouses

Once a valid order is in place, the non-member spouse has two choices:

  • Lump sum: Taxed in the non-member spouse’s name, according to the withdrawal tax tables; or
  • Transfer to another approved fund: A tax-neutral option.

Non-member spouses cannot combine options – they must choose one.  If the order specifies a rand amount and a lump sum is chosen, the amount paid out will be after tax – i.e. the stated figure is a gross amount.

Withdrawals during pending divorce proceedings

Where the fund is notified (with proof) that divorce proceedings are under way, any instruction by the member spouse to withdraw from the savings component cannot be processed without the written consent of the non-member spouse.

This safeguard also applies in cases involving religious marriages and continues until the divorce is finalised.

What this means for financial advisors

  • Definition of pension interest is now standardised across fund types from 1 September 2024.
  • Legal entitlement to pension interest depends on the matrimonial property regime.
  • Order wording is critical. Advisors should be aware of the legal requirements, and consultation with clients’ legal representatives is key to ensure the order can be enforced.
  • Draft orders should be submitted for review to the relevant fund to avoid non-binding outcomes.
  • Withdrawals during divorce are restricted to protect non-member spouses.

These changes aim to bring greater alignment across fund types, but the legal requirements for enforceable orders remain rigorous.

Understanding the updated framework and ensuring precise wording in divorce orders can help clients avoid delays and unintended outcomes.  At a time when clarity and certainty are especially valuable, attention to detail can make a meaningful difference.

Pre-1 September 2024 definition of pension interest

For divorce orders granted before 1 September 2024, pension interest is defined in Section 1 of the Divorce Act as follows:

  • In the case of a member of a pension fund or provident fund (including preservation funds), it refers to the benefits the member would have been entitled to under the rules of the fund, had their membership been terminated on the date of the divorce due to resignation from their office.
  • In the case of a member of a retirement annuity fund, it refers to the total amount of the member’s contributions to the fund up to the date of divorce, plus the accumulated simple interest on those contributions (calculated at the rate prescribed as of that date by the Minister of Justice under Section 1(2) of the Prescribed Rate of Interest Act, 1975, provided it does not exceed fund return).
  • The interest rate referred to above is calculated as the repurchase rate as determined from time to time by the South African Reserve Bank, plus 3.5% per annum. For example, if the repurchase rate is 7%, then the interest rate used to calculate pension interest will be 7% plus 3.5%, which is equal to 10.5%.

 

WRITTEN BY DIONNE NAGAN

Dionne Nagan is a retail legal expert

While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither writers of articles nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein.  Our material is for informational purposes.

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies | POPIA Notice | PAIA
X

Carla Cloete

Director | Attorney, Conveyancer & Notary | LLB

Carla obtained her LLB at the North West University, Potchefstroom Campus in 2015. She completed her articles in 2017 with Brits Dreyer Inc in Bellville. She is an admitted Attorney, Notary and Conveyancer. After her articles she relocated to Kimberley where she worked as a professional assistant in the Conveyancing department of Van de Wall Inc. Coming back to her Western Cape roots, she now joins the PP Smit team as a professional assistant.

Carien Hamman

Attorney & Notary | LLB

Carien grew up and matriculated in the picturesque town of Ceres, whereafter she furthered her studies at the University of Stellenbosch and obtained her LLB degree in 2015. She completed her articles at VanderSpuy Cape Town in 2017 and stayed on as an associate litigant after being admitted as an attorney during early 2018. Carien loves the countryside and thus ventured back to Ceres where she joined Joubert Van Vuuren Inc. for a year. However, when she was presented with the opportunity to enjoy both the country- and the seaside, she couldn’t resist and joined PP Smit Attorneys at the beginning of 2022 as an avid litigator. When she is not at the office, Carien enjoys long walks, wine tasting, and exploring the area with her family and friends.

Harmann Potgieter

Attorney | LLB | NQF 7

Harmann graduated in 2018 with an LLB degree from the North-West University’s Potchefstroom Campus. He went on to study and grow in various fields, including doing a course on the Consumer Protection Act and a course at the University of South Africa where he obtained his NQF 7 Certificate in the Administration of Deceased Estates.

Harmann completed his articles of clerkship at Swemmer & Levin under the supervision of Mr Richard Phillips. After being admitted as an attorney in 2020, Harmann continued with PP Smit Attorneys as a professional assistant in the deceased estates department as well as the litigation department. He loves to study, possesses a deep curiosity about the world, and is dedicated to giving back to the community.

Andre van der Walt

Director | Attorney | LLB

Andre graduated in 2015 with an LLB degree from the University of Pretoria. He later went on to obtain his NQF 7 Certificate in the Administration of Deceased Estates from the University of South Africa, which allowed him to further his career in deceased estates and the drafting of wills and trusts. Andre served his articles at Barnard & Patel Attorneys under the supervision of Mr YAS Patel. After being admitted as an attorney in 2016, he continued working at Barnard & Patel Attorneys as a professional assistant in the deceased estates department.

Andre joined Van Rensburg Attorneys in 2019 and was head of the deceased estates department until 2021. He then received the opportunity to move to the West Coast, where he joined Swemmer & Levin Attorneys, and not too long after that, he grabbed the opportunity to work at PP Smit Attorneys. Andre loves travelling and enjoys the beauty that our country has to offer with his friends, family, and loved ones.

Jandré Smith

Director | Attorney | LLB

Jandré grew up and matriculated in the small Klein Karoo town of Oudtshoorn. He furthered his studies at the North-West University in Potchefstroom, obtaining his LLB degree during 2015. He completed his articles at Swemmer & Levin in 2017 and was subsequently appointed as a professional assistant. In 2020, Jandré was promoted to the position of director of the firm, where he practices in the Litigation department. Jandré additionally joined the company of PP Smit Attorneys during the same year. When not practising law, Jandré is an avid sports fan. He has a passion for nature and enjoys camping, trail running, and mountain biking with his family.

Richard Phillips

Director | Attorney | Bcom & BProc

After matriculating at Paarl Boys’ High School, Richard completed his BCom and BProc degrees at the University of Port Elizabeth. He served his articles with Van Wyk Fouchee in Paarl and quickly developed an affinity for litigation. Richard has always had a deep love for the ocean and when he was presented with an opportunity he joined the company of PP Smit Attorneys during 2006. Richard specialises in general litigation and divorces. When he is not in the office or with his family, he tries to spend as much time as possible in or on the water.

Johann Maree

Director | Attorney | BA. LLB

Johann matriculated at Oudtshoorn High School and attended Stellenbosch University, where he obtained his BA Law and LLB degrees. Following his studies, he worked for three years as State Prosecutor at the Magistrate’s Court in Cape Town. Johann completed his legal training with the State Attorney in Pretoria and then moved to his hometown, Oudtshoorn, where he worked as a lawyer for a year. In 1983, he moved to Vredenburg and joined Swemmer & Levin, where after he joined the company of PP Smit Attorneys during 2006.. When he is not in the office, Johann enjoys cycling and in his earlier days, he used to be a long-distance junkie.

Pieter Smit

Director | Attorney & Conveyancer | BA. LLB

Pieter obtained his BA Law degree from Stellenbosch University in 1995 and his LLB degree from the North-West University in Potchefstroom in 1998. He served his articles at Marais Muller Attorneys from 1998 to 1999 and was admitted as an attorney in 2000 and as a conveyancer in 2002. Pieter is the founder of PP Smit Attorneys, which opened its doors in 2004. He also became a director of Swemmer & Levin in 2006. Pieter loves the outdoors and participating in all forms of sport, including tennis, golf, fishing, spearfishing, scuba diving, and hiking.

Jan Fourie

Director |  Attorney, Notary & Conveyancer | BA. LLB

Jan graduated in 1974 with a five-year BA LLB degree from the University of Stellenbosch, whereafter he was admitted as an advocate and prosecuted as such in the Cape Town and Wynberg Courts. In 1974, he joined Swemmer & Levin as the Candidate Attorney of Mr Levin (founding member) and was admitted as an attorney on 7 April 1976, as a conveyancer on 11 January 1978, and as a Notary on 19 December 1984. Since 1974, he has served in various committees, including the West Coast Chamber of Commerce, the Vredenburg School Committee, and the Malgas Lions Club. In 2004, he also joined the company of PP Smit Attorneys.

Furthermore, Jan was the author of the first bilingual law book, The New Debt Collecting Procedures (Die Nuwe Skuldinvorderingsprosedures), which was used by all the Magistrate Courts throughout South Africa. With the founding of the Small Claims Court in Vredenburg, Jan served as one of the first Commissioners.